On Monday 30 January 2006 19:22, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> One piece missing from this conversation is the issue that we need errors
> in a uniform format. That is why edac_mc has helper functions.
>
> However there will always be errors that don't fit any particular model.
> Could we add a edac_printk(dev, ); That is similar to dev_printk but
> prints out an EDAC header and the device on which the error was found?
> Letting the rest of the string be user specified.
>
> For actual control that interface may be to blunt, but at least for people
> looking in the logs it allows all of the errors to be detected and
> harvested.
Signed-off-by: David S. Peterson <dsp@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>