X-Git-Url: https://err.no/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=blobdiff_plain;f=fs%2Fjbd%2Fcommit.c;h=8e08efcaede26c06d01271b5dbebeafd55a0183d;hb=28ae094c625a9b719c01cf5ec45b8640e6911f53;hp=a003d50edcdbdc1fe45a7627e83191cd55df378c;hpb=2fe83b3ad12d43799af5f3156886eca443a88bac;p=linux-2.6

diff --git a/fs/jbd/commit.c b/fs/jbd/commit.c
index a003d50edc..8e08efcaed 100644
--- a/fs/jbd/commit.c
+++ b/fs/jbd/commit.c
@@ -131,6 +131,8 @@ static int journal_write_commit_record(journal_t *journal,
 		barrier_done = 1;
 	}
 	ret = sync_dirty_buffer(bh);
+	if (barrier_done)
+		clear_buffer_ordered(bh);
 	/* is it possible for another commit to fail at roughly
 	 * the same time as this one?  If so, we don't want to
 	 * trust the barrier flag in the super, but instead want
@@ -148,7 +150,6 @@ static int journal_write_commit_record(journal_t *journal,
 		spin_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
 
 		/* And try again, without the barrier */
-		clear_buffer_ordered(bh);
 		set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
 		set_buffer_dirty(bh);
 		ret = sync_dirty_buffer(bh);
@@ -265,7 +266,7 @@ write_out_data:
 			put_bh(bh);
 		}
 
-		if (lock_need_resched(&journal->j_list_lock)) {
+		if (need_resched() || spin_needbreak(&journal->j_list_lock)) {
 			spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
 			goto write_out_data;
 		}
@@ -375,7 +376,7 @@ void journal_commit_transaction(journal_t *journal)
 			struct buffer_head *bh = jh2bh(jh);
 
 			jbd_lock_bh_state(bh);
-			jbd_slab_free(jh->b_committed_data, bh->b_size);
+			jbd_free(jh->b_committed_data, bh->b_size);
 			jh->b_committed_data = NULL;
 			jbd_unlock_bh_state(bh);
 		}
@@ -466,7 +467,7 @@ void journal_commit_transaction(journal_t *journal)
 	spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
 
 	if (err)
-		__journal_abort_hard(journal);
+		journal_abort(journal, err);
 
 	journal_write_revoke_records(journal, commit_transaction);
 
@@ -524,7 +525,7 @@ void journal_commit_transaction(journal_t *journal)
 
 			descriptor = journal_get_descriptor_buffer(journal);
 			if (!descriptor) {
-				__journal_abort_hard(journal);
+				journal_abort(journal, -EIO);
 				continue;
 			}
 
@@ -557,7 +558,7 @@ void journal_commit_transaction(journal_t *journal)
 		   and repeat this loop: we'll fall into the
 		   refile-on-abort condition above. */
 		if (err) {
-			__journal_abort_hard(journal);
+			journal_abort(journal, err);
 			continue;
 		}
 
@@ -748,7 +749,7 @@ wait_for_iobuf:
 		err = -EIO;
 
 	if (err)
-		__journal_abort_hard(journal);
+		journal_abort(journal, err);
 
 	/* End of a transaction!  Finally, we can do checkpoint
            processing: any buffers committed as a result of this
@@ -792,14 +793,14 @@ restart_loop:
 		 * Otherwise, we can just throw away the frozen data now.
 		 */
 		if (jh->b_committed_data) {
-			jbd_slab_free(jh->b_committed_data, bh->b_size);
+			jbd_free(jh->b_committed_data, bh->b_size);
 			jh->b_committed_data = NULL;
 			if (jh->b_frozen_data) {
 				jh->b_committed_data = jh->b_frozen_data;
 				jh->b_frozen_data = NULL;
 			}
 		} else if (jh->b_frozen_data) {
-			jbd_slab_free(jh->b_frozen_data, bh->b_size);
+			jbd_free(jh->b_frozen_data, bh->b_size);
 			jh->b_frozen_data = NULL;
 		}
 
@@ -858,10 +859,10 @@ restart_loop:
 	}
 	spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
 	/*
-	 * This is a bit sleazy.  We borrow j_list_lock to protect
-	 * journal->j_committing_transaction in __journal_remove_checkpoint.
-	 * Really, __journal_remove_checkpoint should be using j_state_lock but
-	 * it's a bit hassle to hold that across __journal_remove_checkpoint
+	 * This is a bit sleazy.  We use j_list_lock to protect transition
+	 * of a transaction into T_FINISHED state and calling
+	 * __journal_drop_transaction(). Otherwise we could race with
+	 * other checkpointing code processing the transaction...
 	 */
 	spin_lock(&journal->j_state_lock);
 	spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);