val = sysctl_rmem_max;
set_rcvbuf:
sk->sk_userlocks |= SOCK_RCVBUF_LOCK;
- /* FIXME: is this lower bound the right one? */
+ /*
+ * We double it on the way in to account for
+ * "struct sk_buff" etc. overhead. Applications
+ * assume that the SO_RCVBUF setting they make will
+ * allow that much actual data to be received on that
+ * socket.
+ *
+ * Applications are unaware that "struct sk_buff" and
+ * other overheads allocate from the receive buffer
+ * during socket buffer allocation.
+ *
+ * And after considering the possible alternatives,
+ * returning the value we actually used in getsockopt
+ * is the most desirable behavior.
+ */
if ((val * 2) < SOCK_MIN_RCVBUF)
sk->sk_rcvbuf = SOCK_MIN_RCVBUF;
else
atomic_set(&newsk->sk_omem_alloc, 0);
skb_queue_head_init(&newsk->sk_receive_queue);
skb_queue_head_init(&newsk->sk_write_queue);
+#ifdef CONFIG_NET_DMA
+ skb_queue_head_init(&newsk->sk_async_wait_queue);
+#endif
rwlock_init(&newsk->sk_dst_lock);
rwlock_init(&newsk->sk_callback_lock);
skb_queue_head_init(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
skb_queue_head_init(&sk->sk_write_queue);
skb_queue_head_init(&sk->sk_error_queue);
+#ifdef CONFIG_NET_DMA
+ skb_queue_head_init(&sk->sk_async_wait_queue);
+#endif
sk->sk_send_head = NULL;