cpu-hotplug: replace lock_cpu_hotplug() with get_online_cpus()

[linux-2.6] / net / core / flow.c

diff --git a/net/core/flow.c b/net/core/flow.c
index 051430545a05364bb9864df299c93130edaa626a..6489f4e24ecf118f98a457284d130973ca841130 100644 (file)
--- a/net/core/flow.c
+++ b/net/core/flow.c
@@ -142,8 +142,6 @@ typedef u64 flow_compare_t;
 typedef u32 flow_compare_t;
 #endif
 
-extern void flowi_is_missized(void);
-
 /* I hear what you're saying, use memcmp.  But memcmp cannot make
  * important assumptions that we can here, such as alignment and
  * constant size.
@@ -153,8 +151,7 @@ static int flow_key_compare(struct flowi *key1, struct flowi *key2)
        flow_compare_t *k1, *k1_lim, *k2;
        const int n_elem = sizeof(struct flowi) / sizeof(flow_compare_t);
 
-       if (sizeof(struct flowi) % sizeof(flow_compare_t))
-               flowi_is_missized();
+       BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct flowi) % sizeof(flow_compare_t));
 
        k1 = (flow_compare_t *) key1;
        k1_lim = k1 + n_elem;
@@ -296,7 +293,7 @@ void flow_cache_flush(void)
        static DEFINE_MUTEX(flow_flush_sem);
 
        /* Don't want cpus going down or up during this. */
-       lock_cpu_hotplug();
+       get_online_cpus();
        mutex_lock(&flow_flush_sem);
        atomic_set(&info.cpuleft, num_online_cpus());
        init_completion(&info.completion);
@@ -308,7 +305,7 @@ void flow_cache_flush(void)
 
        wait_for_completion(&info.completion);
        mutex_unlock(&flow_flush_sem);
-       unlock_cpu_hotplug();
+       put_online_cpus();
 }
 
 static void __devinit flow_cache_cpu_prepare(int cpu)
@@ -350,7 +347,7 @@ static int __init flow_cache_init(void)
        flow_cachep = kmem_cache_create("flow_cache",
                                        sizeof(struct flow_cache_entry),
                                        0, SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN|SLAB_PANIC,
-                                       NULL, NULL);
+                                       NULL);
        flow_hash_shift = 10;
        flow_lwm = 2 * flow_hash_size;
        flow_hwm = 4 * flow_hash_size;