* by Davide Libenzi, preemptible kernel bits by Robert Love.
* 2003-09-03 Interactivity tuning by Con Kolivas.
* 2004-04-02 Scheduler domains code by Nick Piggin
+ * 2007-04-15 Work begun on replacing all interactivity tuning with a
+ * fair scheduling design by Con Kolivas.
+ * 2007-05-05 Load balancing (smp-nice) and other improvements
+ * by Peter Williams
+ * 2007-05-06 Interactivity improvements to CFS by Mike Galbraith
+ * 2007-07-01 Group scheduling enhancements by Srivatsa Vaddagiri
*/
#include <linux/mm.h>
struct lock_class_key rq_lock_key;
};
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rq, runqueues) ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct rq, runqueues);
static DEFINE_MUTEX(sched_hotcpu_mutex);
static inline void check_preempt_curr(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
#define task_rq(p) cpu_rq(task_cpu(p))
#define cpu_curr(cpu) (cpu_rq(cpu)->curr)
+/*
+ * For kernel-internal use: high-speed (but slightly incorrect) per-cpu
+ * clock constructed from sched_clock():
+ */
+unsigned long long cpu_clock(int cpu)
+{
+ struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
+ unsigned long long now;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&rq->lock, flags);
+ now = rq_clock(rq);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, flags);
+
+ return now;
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
/* Change a task's ->cfs_rq if it moves across CPUs */
static inline void set_task_cfs_rq(struct task_struct *p)
*
* The "10% effect" is relative and cumulative: from _any_ nice level,
* if you go up 1 level, it's -10% CPU usage, if you go down 1 level
- * it's +10% CPU usage.
+ * it's +10% CPU usage. (to achieve that we use a multiplier of 1.25.
+ * If a task goes up by ~10% and another task goes down by ~10% then
+ * the relative distance between them is ~25%.)
*/
static const int prio_to_weight[40] = {
/* -20 */ 88818, 71054, 56843, 45475, 36380, 29104, 23283, 18626, 14901, 11921,
/* 10 */ 110, 87, 70, 56, 45, 36, 29, 23, 18, 15,
};
+/*
+ * Inverse (2^32/x) values of the prio_to_weight[] array, precalculated.
+ *
+ * In cases where the weight does not change often, we can use the
+ * precalculated inverse to speed up arithmetics by turning divisions
+ * into multiplications:
+ */
static const u32 prio_to_wmult[40] = {
- 48356, 60446, 75558, 94446, 118058, 147573,
- 184467, 230589, 288233, 360285, 450347,
- 562979, 703746, 879575, 1099582, 1374389,
- 717986, 2147483, 2684354, 3355443, 4194304,
- 244160, 6557201, 8196502, 10250518, 12782640,
- 16025997, 19976592, 24970740, 31350126, 39045157,
- 49367440, 61356675, 76695844, 95443717, 119304647,
- 148102320, 186737708, 238609294, 286331153,
+/* -20 */ 48356, 60446, 75558, 94446, 118058,
+/* -15 */ 147573, 184467, 230589, 288233, 360285,
+/* -10 */ 450347, 562979, 703746, 879575, 1099582,
+/* -5 */ 1374389, 1717986, 2147483, 2684354, 3355443,
+/* 0 */ 4194304, 5244160, 6557201, 8196502, 10250518,
+/* 5 */ 12782640, 16025997, 19976592, 24970740, 31350126,
+/* 10 */ 39045157, 49367440, 61356675, 76695844, 95443717,
+/* 15 */ 119304647, 148102320, 186737708, 238609294, 286331153,
};
static inline void
rq = cpu_rq(i);
- if (*sd_idle && !idle_cpu(i))
+ if (*sd_idle && rq->nr_running)
*sd_idle = 0;
/* Bias balancing toward cpus of our domain */
/*
* First idle cpu or the first cpu(busiest) in this sched group
* is eligible for doing load balancing at this and above
- * domains.
+ * domains. In the newly idle case, we will allow all the cpu's
+ * to do the newly idle load balance.
*/
- if (local_group && balance_cpu != this_cpu && balance) {
+ if (idle != CPU_NEWLY_IDLE && local_group &&
+ balance_cpu != this_cpu && balance) {
*balance = 0;
goto ret;
}
unsigned long imbalance;
int nr_moved = 0;
int sd_idle = 0;
+ int all_pinned = 0;
cpumask_t cpus = CPU_MASK_ALL;
/*
double_lock_balance(this_rq, busiest);
nr_moved = move_tasks(this_rq, this_cpu, busiest,
minus_1_or_zero(busiest->nr_running),
- imbalance, sd, CPU_NEWLY_IDLE, NULL);
+ imbalance, sd, CPU_NEWLY_IDLE,
+ &all_pinned);
spin_unlock(&busiest->lock);
- if (!nr_moved) {
+ if (unlikely(all_pinned)) {
cpu_clear(cpu_of(busiest), cpus);
if (!cpus_empty(cpus))
goto redo;
state = p->state ? __ffs(p->state) + 1 : 0;
printk("%-13.13s %c", p->comm,
state < sizeof(stat_nam) - 1 ? stat_nam[state] : '?');
-#if (BITS_PER_LONG == 32)
+#if BITS_PER_LONG == 32
if (state == TASK_RUNNING)
- printk(" running ");
+ printk(" running ");
else
- printk(" %08lX ", thread_saved_pc(p));
+ printk(" %08lx ", thread_saved_pc(p));
#else
if (state == TASK_RUNNING)
- printk(" running task ");
+ printk(" running task ");
else
printk(" %016lx ", thread_saved_pc(p));
#endif
free = (unsigned long)n - (unsigned long)end_of_stack(p);
}
#endif
- printk("%5lu %5d %6d", free, p->pid, p->parent->pid);
- if (!p->mm)
- printk(" (L-TLB)\n");
- else
- printk(" (NOTLB)\n");
+ printk("%5lu %5d %6d\n", free, p->pid, p->parent->pid);
if (state != TASK_RUNNING)
show_stack(p, NULL);
{
struct task_struct *g, *p;
-#if (BITS_PER_LONG == 32)
- printk("\n"
- " free sibling\n");
- printk(" task PC stack pid father child younger older\n");
+#if BITS_PER_LONG == 32
+ printk(KERN_INFO
+ " task PC stack pid father\n");
#else
- printk("\n"
- " free sibling\n");
- printk(" task PC stack pid father child younger older\n");
+ printk(KERN_INFO
+ " task PC stack pid father\n");
#endif
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
do_each_thread(g, p) {
static inline void sched_init_granularity(void)
{
unsigned int factor = 1 + ilog2(num_online_cpus());
- const unsigned long gran_limit = 10000000;
+ const unsigned long gran_limit = 100000000;
sysctl_sched_granularity *= factor;
if (sysctl_sched_granularity > gran_limit)
struct migration_req *req;
struct list_head *head;
- try_to_freeze();
-
spin_lock_irq(&rq->lock);
if (cpu_is_offline(cpu)) {
p = kthread_create(migration_thread, hcpu, "migration/%d", cpu);
if (IS_ERR(p))
return NOTIFY_BAD;
- p->flags |= PF_NOFREEZE;
kthread_bind(p, cpu);
/* Must be high prio: stop_machine expects to yield to it. */
rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags);